We are the music makers and we are the dreamers of dreams
canuck04
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit canuck04's Xanga Site!

Name: Kyle
Birthday: 7/12/1985


Interests: God, Golf, music, and my friends, i love my friends
Expertise: Absolutely nothing (:
Occupation: Student


Message: message meEmail: email me
AIM: canuckgolfer04


Member Since: 8/12/2004

SubscriptionsSites I Read
mavrik23
chpmnkjenn
CamCraz3112
JulzMarie
vanessa_gabriel
shortcake_strawberry_pink
RedFarmer06
chechica2005
pitythisbig_monster
frontdeskMVP
mattea001
KathrynJoy
Kruiser911
jaminben04
onegrlrevolutn12
RedSkyRocket114
whoami_really

Blogrings
M-Ville peeps
previous - random - next

jesus = <3
previous - random - next

GVSU Jesus Lovers
previous - random - next

Grand Valley State University
previous - random - next

Mars Hill Students!
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Monday, April 07, 2008

blogspot

so i don't so much post on here anymore, so you should subscribe to the blog i do use: http://kylejoshua85.blogspot.com

thanks,
kyle


Monday, March 24, 2008

Maybe Our Going Problem is a Growing Problem

"It seems incredibly ironic that as we mature and get to know scripture better and get to know Jesus better and are transformed all the more by the Spirit, fewer non-Christians get to experience those things through relationships with us...If Jesus sent us on a mission to be his salt and light to others, why is it that we have basically set up our church systems and subcultures to remove maturing people from relationships with people outside of the church?" - Dan Kimball, They Like Jesus But Not The Church

Christian subculture, eh? Good thing there aren't any of those in West Michigan.

I grew up in the church, and I've been really convicted about "going" lately. (not the kind of "going problem" that indicates an enlarged prostate, but the kind of "going" that refers to mission and evangelism.)

A favorite slogan of a lot of churches these days is "We meet you where you're at..."

...that is, if "where you're at" happens to be our sanctuary on Sunday at 9 a.m., 10:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.

I think my friend Dave hit the nail on the head with this one.
Currently Reading
They Like Jesus but Not the Church: Insights from Emerging Generations
By Dan Kimball
see related


Thursday, March 20, 2008

Why Affirmative action must become Incarnational or Die

For spring break, I spent a week in Newark, NJ. We worked with a church there to run an after-school program for the kids at Hawkins Street School, which was located just across the street, and just down the street from the local set of the Crips. During the week we got a chance to go into the school and spend some time getting to know the teachers and helping the kids with their work.

I don’t want to appear too harsh in my judgment of the teachers because they seem to be wonderful people who are doing a good work by educating these kids, and I could easily be dismissed as some comfortable white kid from the suburbs just jumping up on his high horse after his first experience in the inner city. The thing is, a few things I noticed really disturbed me.

The Ironbound neighborhood of Newark is a very diverse area, made up of countless different ethnic groups. None of those groups, however, are white. From what I gathered on my trip, the area has one of the largest Portuguese-speaking communities in the U.S., a product of both Portuguese and Brazilian immigration. In addition, the majority of the people we met that week were African-American. Almost all of the white people we met during the week were from outside of the community we stayed in.

None of that is really surprising. What surprised me was that almost all of the teachers and the school’s administrators were white. There were a few Hispanic teachers, but I don’t recall any African-Americans. The security guards and janitors were black, but none of the educators.

The other surprise was the attitude of the teachers. Most of the students were preparing for the New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK) that they would be taking a week later. Many of the teachers we spoke to had a very pessimistic attitude about the students’ chances of passing the test (They also had a negative attitude about where the money goes when schools are rewarded, but I can understand why they think the kids’ hard work shouldn’t result in administrators lining their pockets with the tax money given to schools for good scores).

I actually don’t think it was their attitudes that bothered me as much as their willingness to share those attitudes in front of the kids. If they don’t expect them to do well, there isn’t much you can do about that; but when these kids here their teacher telling some college kid from Michigan that their students don’t have a chance of passing the test, they probably won’t have much faith in themselves to pass it either.

What I saw was an absence of culturally - relevant role models in these kids’ lives to affirm them and encourage them and help them believe that things can be different.

What I saw was a bunch of white women who clearly loved these kids, but in my opinion failed to affirm them as valuable and capable. (I must note, however, that there were exceptions among them.)

Personally, I think that these kids are the people that Affirmative Action should be aimed at serving. The problem, however, is that Affirmative Action is as effective as Band-Aid over a bullet wound – it covers the problem by helping persons of an ethic minority (by the way, these are the people I’m referring to in this post, so please don’t lecture me on how AA helps women too – I realize that) get into colleges and obtain careers, but ignores the deeper societal issues that prevent many of them from qualifying for college entry on their own respective merits. In order for real healing to occur, the bullet must be dug out before it gets a chance to fester.

What bothers me is that instead of focusing on a cultural shift, Affirmative Action encourages upward mobility. I'm not entirely discouraging upward mobility; accumulation of wealth isn't bad or sinful in and of itself. But the goal seems to be to escape from places like Newark rather than to transform them. You might think it a stretch, but I believe this actually mirrors the escape-theology of many Christians today. Contrary to the traditional Christian belief in a new, redeemed creation on earth, as illustrated by N.T. Wright’s Surprised by Hope, many people in the church believe that our ultimate hope is to escape this supposedly God-forsaken place and get to Heaven.


Properly, we believe in a redeemable creation. The way to join with God in His work to renew the world is not to cut ourselves off from it, but to enter into it as Jesus did.


Likewise, the redemption of the inner city isn’t found in escape; it’s found in its children returning, better equipped to do the work necessary to restore it.

Young, black men, who often only get to witness their adult counterparts succeed in sports, music or the drug trade (it’s not that there aren’t others, but when does a kid in the inner city get to see the success stories?), aren’t going to be motivated by being placed under the authority of another white woman. They need to be mentored by black men who are successful and driven and care enough to return and work toward the transformation of these communities. They need to believe in the possibility of change. The same is true for the relationships between black girls and their educators.

Diversity initiatives at colleges and businesses are not enough. The change has to start from the core of the educational system. It makes no sense for a child to attend a sub-par primary and secondary school and then be expected to succeed at a university.

Unless the government can develop a program that encourages and rewards a lifestyle that mimics incarnational ministry, it will not be effectual in transforming the inner cities of America.

Please don’t confuse this with an excuse to get out of living incarnationally myself. I think white people need to be in the inner cities too. As Christians, we are called to make disciples of all ethnos (people who are different than us), so I think it’s absolutely necessary that we go and serve the “least of these” no matter what our race. I just recognize that someone who comes from a suburban, all-white town in Michigan can’t possibly expect to be as relevant to a kid from Newark as another guy who grew up just down the block.


I will always believe that God’s model for transformation is better than ours.

Grace and Peace, Kyle Joshua

Oh and btw, Happy belated St. Patrick's Day!

Currently Reading
The Hidden Power of Electronic Culture: How Media Shapes Faith, the Gospel, and Church
By Shane Hipps
see related


Thursday, March 13, 2008

A Sports Fan? Seriously?

"Agence France-Presse's Olivier Knox asked Bush why he was going to the Olympics in China despite the country's human-rights record. "I'm a sports fan," the president said."

Seriously?!

These two articles from the Seattle Times caught my attention today:

$4-a-gallon gas? Predictions surprise Bush

and

Wait, what did you just say? Our leaders are out of touch?



"France has public intellectuals. We have Dr. Phil" - Bill Maher
Currently Listening
In Rainbows
By Radiohead
see related


Thursday, February 28, 2008

Blogs and The Priesthood of All Believers

I've been really getting into reading a lot of blogs lately, and I've been thinking about how they can and are being used to either further or hinder the Kingdom. One that really peaked my interest was a post on the God's Politics Blog a few weeks ago by Shane Claiborne. Apparently he was supposed to speak at Cedarville University recently, but was canceled in response to "angry bloggers" criticizing the school's decision to allow an emergent (I've never heard Claiborne use this word to describe himself, but he did call himself a "postmodern" in his book, The Irresistible Revolution) to speak at their "theologically conservative" school. He spoke at nearby Apex Community Church in Dayton, Ohio instead.

I'm going to digress, but just for a moment...

I read Claiborne's book, and I heard him speak at Mars Hill (Grand Rapids) last winter. Nothing he said seemed too heretical. Maybe liberal, if your definition of liberal is this:

2 a: marked by generosity : openhanded liberal giver> b: given or provided in a generous and openhanded way liberal meal> c: ample, full

but not if your definition is like the one Donald Miller describes in Searching for God Knows What:

"I do not think a person can take two issues from scripture, those being abortion and gay marriage, and adhere to them as sins, then neglect much of the rest and call themselves a fundamentalist or even a conservative. The person who believes the sum of his morality involves gay marriage and abortion alone, and neglects health care and world trade and the environment and loving his neighbor and feeding the poor is, by definition, a theological liberal, because he takes what he wants from scripture and ignores the rest."


And as an aside from an aside, one of those bloggers, in criticizing Claiborne, failed to recognize the difference between emerging and emergent, and bashed him for being "friendly with Brian McLaren" because he noted McLaren's home church in the "Local Revolutions and Ordinary Radicals" appendix of his book. I'm not a fan of McLaren, but correct me if I'm wrong - aren't we supposed to be "friendly" with everyone, loving even our enemies?

Anyways, what I really want to mention - something that will take much less time to write about - is the relationship I see between blogs and the doctrine of the Priesthood of all Believers - the concept that we are all "royal priests" who are to show the world the "goodness of God"

As we enter postmodernity, or exit it, or whatever we're doing, we realize that the world is smaller. With the increased speed of transportation and information exchange, the whole world is, essentially, local. And with the advent of new media forms like blogs and YouTube, everyone has a voice.

The playing field has been leveled. With the slow demise of the robust hierarchy exclusively practiced in the modern era, even we - priests sans seminary - have a platform that is (more) equal to the trained, the ordained and the televised.

We have more responsibility, too.

In his post, Claiborne wrote, "
The Internet has made it possible for every person to have channels of significant influence at their fingertips, regardless of credibility or content. This can be used for good or for bad."

He's right. And what is really scary is what might come from the "bad" that he's talking about.

James 3:1 says "Not many of you should presume to be teachers, my brothers, because you know that we who teach will be judged more strictly."

The ministry opportunities afforded to us by the Internet are endless and exciting, but I think we should choose our words carefully, and lovingly, if we choose to speak or write any at all.

Grace and Peace,

Kyle

   
Currently Reading
The Millennium Matrix: Reclaiming the Past, Reframing the Future of the Church (J-B Leadership Network Series)
By M. Rex Miller
see related



Next 5 >>